access_code.set_on_device—with an intent-oriented lifecycle vocabulary that tells you whether the access code will work as requested. See Lifecycle Events for what each new event means and the recommended action to take.
The existing device-oriented names are deprecated. Update your webhook handlers and error-handling logic to use the new names, using the mappings below.
Events
Errors
Warnings
Migration Notes
- Updates had no dedicated event before. Editing an existing code’s PIN, name, or time frame previously reused
access_code.set_on_deviceandaccess_code.failed_to_set_on_device. The newaccess_code.failed_to_updateevent covers failed updates cleanly, so some traffic that firesaccess_code.failed_to_set_on_devicetoday maps toaccess_code.failed_to_updategoing forward, notaccess_code.failed_to_issue. - One success event.
access_code.set_on_deviceandaccess_code.scheduled_on_devicewere two events for the same idea with different timings, and sometimes Seam would send only one and not the other. The singleaccess_code.issuedevent supersedes both. - Removal failures map to
failed_to_remove.access_code.failed_to_remove_from_devicenow maps toaccess_code.failed_to_remove, which covers any case where the removal or deletion didn’t go through and the code may remain active pastends_at. - Seam always keeps trying. Even after an access code emits one of the failure events, Seam may still emit a success event, such as
access_code.issued, if a retry is able to program the code.